Posts Tagged ‘ Money ’

Jobs in the Philippines – Online Sales Agents

Online Sales Agents

Requirements:
1.]Knows how to surf/chat / make profiles.

2.]Openminded and Honest.

3.]Needs money and stable work w/ pay.

4.]Preferable to have experience in Chat campaigns.
apply via email ,Graduates or Undergraduates M/F or whatever your gender preference. open for everyone,

Date: 3 February 2010
City/Town: Davao city
Location: Davao
Wage/Salary: tbd
Start: asap
Duration: for as long as you want
Type: Full Time
How to apply: email
Company: Chatlive & co.
Contact: Jun enero
Phone:
Fax:
Email: chatandco@live.com

Home Based Writer | COURT FIELD TRIP ASSIGNMENT

Avail of this opportunity here: Make money online by writing.

COURT FIELD TRIP ASSIGNMENT

The court field trip assignment is worth 20% of the overall marks for this subject.


Purpose:         This assessment is designed:


  1. to expose you to the reality of court procedures and to allow you to develop a better understanding of how the law is enforced in Australia;


  1. to give you experience in the preparation of a written report of your observations and experiences in a court room setting;


  1. to give you experience of working with a partner collaboratively in the processing of information in an unfamiliar environment (court rooms).


Procedure:


  1. In tutorial 2, you will be asked to choose a partner from your tutorial group with whom you will work with on this project.


With a partner, you need to choose a suitable date to attend the Magistrates Court AND the District or Supreme Court.  The District and Supreme courts are situated together on George Street between Adelaide and Ann Streets, just a block west from the river end of Queen Street Mall.  The city Magistrates Court is further along George Street on Hershel Street (I believe).  Check in the White Pages online.  As adults you can attend any court sitting as long as it is Open Court not Closed Court.  The status of the court sitting will be clearly posted.

Once you get to the courthouse, you can check the displays of what cases are being heard and select one or two that would be most interesting for you. Alternatively, you can access the law list via the website www.courts.qld.gov.au by first going to ‘practice and procedure’ then to the law list.  Usually the best time to attend is when the courts open at 10:00am.  You should arrive 10 to 15 minutes early.

  1. WHEN you attend is purely YOUR responsibility.  It is strongly advised, however, that students go sooner than later as there is usually no notice given as to when the courts will be officially closed.


  1. You may sit in on any matter, including a trial or hearing, whether it is civil or criminal, the swearing in of a jury, a call over, sentencing and so on.  You are there to observe what goes on in our court system.


  1. Both you and your partner should remain at court as long as needed to obtain sufficient information to prepare your assignment of 800 to 1,000 words in total (ie. that includes both courts).  You should aim to write no more than about 500 words on each court.


  1. Students should only need to attend the courts for approximately 1-2 hours as proceedings can be brief – particularly in the Magistrates Court.  District and Supreme Court proceedings may continue for days.  (Note:  students may remain as long or as briefly as they choose).


  1. You are to come to an agreement with your partner as to which one will write up the Magistrates Court summary and which will write the District or Supreme Court summary. This is at your discretion. When it comes time to hand in your assignment, you are to attach both summaries (both parts), clearly stating the name of the author at the top of the relevant part to form a single assignment of both courts. Each part will be marked independently out of 20.


  1. You are each responsible to ensure that you and your partner hand in an assignment that includes a summary of both courts.  Should your partner become ill, leave the course, or otherwise not attend the court, thus failing to create his or her agreed summary, you are responsible for writing the other part yourself so that you are in a position to hand in a complete assignment (containing both court summaries) – [of course with only your name on it].  This is why you must ensure that you attend both courts and take the appropriate notes so that, should it become necessary, you can finish the assignment yourself and submit it, and will be assessed out of 20.  If you submit an assignment which reports on only one court, you will be assessed out of 10 ONLY and automatically forfeit the other 10 marks.


  1. If all goes according to plan, and you and your partner submit an assignment containing a summary of each court, each part will then be marked independently out of 20.  You are encouraged to swap your court summary with your partner for comment and for proof reading purposes. It is up to the author of each part whether or not he/she adopts or ignores the other person’s recommendations. You are free to assist each other and create the entire document together provided that when it comes time to writing it up, each person writes at least half of the assignment i.e. one court each must be actually written by each student.


  1. If you have special circumstances that prevent you from working in a group, you may approach the lecturers and request that you do the assignment by yourself.  If you are permitted to work alone or you do not have a partner because of late enrolment, for example, you must write the entire assignment yourself.  Please note this at the top of the first page of your assignment in BOLD. This will alert the marker to the fact that there is only one author.


10.  When submitting the assignment through SAFEassign on LearnJCU, fill in a cover page available online and attach to the two court summaries.



Tips on Court Etiquette:

  • If you have any queries once you arrive at the courts, ask the uniformed Court Officer for assistance;
  • When you enter the courts You MUST BE QUIET;
  • A small bow while facing the front of the court (the Crest) before entering or leaving is customary and shows respect;
  • Dress neatly and conservatively with closed shoes (not thongs);
  • Should anyone speak to you, be polite and courteous;
  • Sit at the back of the courts or in the public gallery in the District or Supreme Courts;
  • Do not approach the Bench, Clerks of the court or Judge’s associates etc. during the course of the proceedings, but you may wish to speak with them at the end of proceedings.
  • Stand whenever the judge or magistrate enters or leaves the courtroom.
  • If there is paper blocking the windows of a Magistrate Court do not enter as the court is closed to the public.


DO NOT use tape recorders or bring them into the courtroom.

Writing the Assignment


Each person working in a group is to prepare and submit an assignment of 800 to 1,000 WORDS about the two courts visited by your group.  Words over that limit will not be read.  As you are not law students, you are not expected to produce a legal assignment.  Rather, you are to write about what you observe while at the courts.  Difficult legal terminology is to be avoided.  Instead, you should pay particular attention to punctuation, spelling, grammar and expression, as these will be a focus for the marking.  Assignments should be double line spaced in essay form (not in point form).


You may write in the first person if you prefer, however, law assignments are usually written in the third person.  Ensure you construct full sentences and that you set your spell-check on your computers to ‘English’ and NOT ‘American’ spelling. Marks may be lost for the American version of spelling.  Subheadings are encouraged and these do not form part of the word count. Your work must be original and there is no need for students to use textbooks or other materials. However, if you do use any such materials you are to include a full reference to the materials in a bibliography.  Various style guides or style manuals for authors are available at the library such as: Style Manual for authors, editors and printers, John Wiley & Sons, 2002, 6th ed.


Content: This is a Guide only.  Assignments may contain some or all of the following:

  • Date and time of visit
  • Which court/s you attended
  • Who was presiding (the name of the judge or magistrate)
  • Nature of proceedings (criminal/civil etc.)
  • A brief summary of the matter including – name of the parties, solicitors or barristers appearing, nature of the dispute, summary of the arguments, the decision of the magistrate or judge (if any)
  • Include a summary of your personal observations and whether you think you gained something from your visit to the courts.


There will be no marks allocated to photographs or diagrams so please do not include cartoons or other symbols in the body of your assignment. Newspaper clippings of the trial are interesting and are welcome if you wish to attach them to your assignment, but again, they will not be assessable.

Avail of this opportunity here: Make money online by writing.

Make Money with Rimas Candy

breadfuit

“Rimas” is also known as breadfruit which was made popular in Jamaica, and closely related to jackfruit or “langka” in Tagalog. Breadfruit trees are mistaken as ornamental trees because of its looks. Like jackfruits, rimas can be cooked as food and likewise processed into candies and sold in the market. Here’s how:

Materials: 1 kilo rimas

1 kilo sugar

Lime

Metabisulfite

Procedure:

1.Select firm, mature unripe rimas.

2.Blanch for 5 minutes and peel.

3.Slice about ½ inch each.

4.Soak in metabisulfite for 30 minutes (A pinch of metabisulfite for every

4 cups water)

5.Soak in lime for 4 hours (1 tsp. lime to every 4 cups water)

6.Wash and blanch for 5 minutes.

7.Boil in syrup for 20 minutes and soak overnight (2 cups water and 4 cups sugar).

8.Drain syrup and boil by adding 1 cup sugar for every 4 cups sugar used.

9. Repeat procedure no. 8 until syrup becomes thick.

10.Drain syrup and wash rimas lightly with warm water.

11. Arrange on tray and dry in solar drier for 2 days.

12. Dust with confectioner’s sugar and pack in plastic bags.

Make Money Writing | Earn $48

Here’s a $48 dollar project you can take from get-paid-to-write online companies.

You are to put yourself into the shoes of an analyst, working for an intergovernmental organization (IGO) such as the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund. You have been given the assignment of doing a country assessment on INDONESIA, and to formally present your findings to policy makers within your state. The idea is that the information that you provide to these policy makers may actually shape the manner in which they pursue their development in the future. Note that you should not necessarily be restricted to the culture or philosophy that these specific organizations may or may not subscribe to.

1. What is the current level of development of your country? Remember that it will be essential for you to provide a clear explanation of how you are conceptualizing development. Are you viewing it in economic, political, or social terms; or some combination of these categories? What sort of indicators are you using to assess the country’s level of development? Provide the reader/audience with a clear sense of why you are assessing the country in the way that you are.

2. What policy decisions and/or other factors have gotten the state to this point? Make a strong logical and empirically-based argument for why you see these factors as contributing to your country’s development status. Among others, you may use the following factors if you wish:
the 1997 asian crisis, lack of qualities to attract foreign investment, corruption, human rights violations.

3. What course of action do you propose to improve the development conditions within your country? What policies should the government enact, and how should they pursue their implementation? What sort of assistance or resources should the government seek from outside, if any? Make a strong argument for why your proposed course of action is likely to be effective in achieving the desired results for your country.

Include an abstract of 150 words after the title page.
use APSA (American Political Science Association) Referencing.

Make money online now!

Get Paid to Do Academia | Earn $30

To avail of this work opportunity, join Work from Home Academia sites now. Academia sites pays $4-$20 per page for writing reports, research, essays, etc. There are several other companies that allow you to earn for doing Academia related work: Make Money by Doing Home Work.

What sort of questions should be answered in your research proposal?

What sources of literature have you used to give you an initial understanding of the problem?
How has the literature review informed your research design?
What type of empirical data do you need? (e.g. if you need to collect data on people, do you need their opinions, or their behaviours or something else? Is your research interested in different categories of people? How can you get access to these people?)
What data collection methods would you use?
Are there any limitations in your chosen data collection method? if so, how could you minimise those limitations?
What are the important concepts or variables and how would you measure them? (e.g. if you are researching the impact of a new marketing initiative, how will you measure ‘impact’?)
What is your population? What sampling strategy would you use and why?
How would you try to ensure that your findings are valid and reliable?  
Does your research design enable you to triangulate your data?
Could you pilot your data collection method? If so, how would you do that?
What ethical issues might you face in this research, and how could you deal with them?   
How would you analyse your data?
How would you present your findings?
What would be the key activities if you were to conduct your research, and in what order would you conduct them?

For your individual research proposal submitted in week 11, content and format should be as follows:
[Content – you should have the following sections]
Introduction to the problem
[This section should introduce the problem and explain the objectives of the research project]
Literature review
[This section should discuss and critically evaluate the sources of information you have used to gain an understanding of the problem. You should explain how the literature has informed your research design.  
Research design
[This section should present your intended research strategy (e.g. exploratory or explanatory or evaluative), sampling strategy, data collection methods, data analysis methods, and ideas for presenting findings to your client. You show how your research will answer the questions raised by your client]
Practical and ethical issues
[This section should discuss any ethical concerns that need to be resolved, any potential problems of research access, any limitations of your research design, and other practical issues you think are relevant to your case]
Plan and timetable of activities
[This section should present the timetable of activities for the research]
Appendix: Data collection instrument
[For example, include your questionnaire, and/or your schedule of interview questions, and/or your observation schedule, etc. to show in detail how you intend to collect data. If your research design includes several data collection instruments, include just one in the appendix]
Appendix: References
[Format]
Be approximately 4-5 pages in length (excluding the front cover and appendices such as your main data collection instrument).  
Margins: Left and right margins = 3 cm; top and bottom margins = 2.5 cms
Line space = ‘one-and-a-half’
Font size for main text = 11 points; font type = Arial
.

Note on references
Last semester, some students asked ‘how much referencing about research methods is needed for the proposal?’
Our response was as follows:
When writing about research design and so on, we don’t expect each and every definition (such as ‘snowball sampling’) to be referenced to a textbook. These are widely used terms. We’re looking for the skill with which you apply your understanding of these methods to your particular problem, e.g. we’d expect you to explain your reasons why you’re using a particular sampling method. You can substantiate your argument by referring to credible authors – for example those who show from their own research that the method is appropriate. By referencing in this way you show you can use references to substantiate your decisions and your arguments.

The following pages show the marking criteria grid and feedback sheet for your group assignment. You do not need to include these sheets with your assignment. They are for your information.
Individual coursework – marking criteria grid  1
TOPIC/
CRITERION
A
B+
B
C
REFER/FAIL
1. Clarity of problem-definition and research objectives

Has defined problem and objectives in detail. Shows an excellent understanding of the issues and addresses them comprehensively and imaginatively.
Has defined problem and objectives in some detail. Shows a good understanding of the issues and addresses them comprehensively.
Has defined problem and objectives adequately. Shows some understanding of the issues and addresses them adequately.
Has defined some aspects of the problem and objectives. Shows limited understanding of the issues and how to address them.
Fails to adequately define problem and objectives.
2. Research design (including justification with reference to research principles)    
Has identified a very well-justified research design which is very logical and coherent, and which is appropriate to the research problem and objectives.
Has identified a well-justified research design which is logical and coherent, and which is appropriate to the research problem and objectives.
Has identified a research design which is partially justified, and which is adequate for the research problem and objective.
There are some flaws in the logic and coherence of the design.
Has identified a research design which is adequate for the research problem and objective, but which has some inconsistencies and/or lacks coherence.
Has identified a research design which is not appropriate to the research problem. There is very limited justification.
3. Literature review

Has identified and critically evaluated a range of sources of information appropriate for the literature review, and has fully discussed how they inform the research design.
Sources are relevant and address the complexity of the research problem.
Has identified and critically evaluated a range of sources of information appropriate for the literature review, and has discussed how they inform the research design.
Sources are relevant but don’t address the full complexity of the research problem.
Has identified and partially evaluated a range of sources of information appropriate for the literature review, and includes some discussion of how they inform the research design.
Sources are relevant but don’t address the full complexity of the research problem.
Has identified and partially evaluated a limited range of sources of information appropriate for the literature review’.
Some sources are relevant but don’t address the full complexity of the research problem.
Has identified a very limited range of sources. Little or no evidence of evaluation of the sources.

TOPIC/
CRITERION
A
B+
B
C
REFER/FAIL
4. Discussion of practical and ethical issues, including proposed timescale
Has an excellent understanding of the practical issues and ethical concerns relating to the research problem and design. Limitations of the research design are very well discussed. Timescale demonstrates a good understanding of the practical aspects of the research process.
Has a good understanding of the practical issues and ethical concerns relating to the research problem and design. Limitations of the research design are well discussed. Timescale demonstrates an adequate understanding of the practical aspects of the research process.
Has an adequate understanding of the practical issues and ethical concerns relating to the research problem and design. Some limitations of the research design are discussed. Timescale demonstrates some understanding of the practical aspects of the research process.
Has some understanding of the practical issues and ethical concerns relating to the research problem and design. Limitations of the research design are not adequately discussed. Timescale demonstrates limited understanding of the practical aspects of the research process.
Has demonstrated little or no understanding of the practical issues and ethical concerns relating to the research problem and design.
5. Data collection instrument(s)
Has produced a very well-constructed data collection instrument which demonstrates an appreciation of the complexity of the research problem and the data needed.
Has produced a well-constructed data collection instrument which demonstrates an appreciation of the complexity of the research problem and the data needed.
Has produced an adequately-constructed data collection instrument which demonstrates some appreciation of the complexity of the research problem and the data needed.
Has produced a data collection instrument which demonstrates limited appreciation of the complexity of the research problem and the data needed.
Has produced a data collection instrument which demonstrates a lack of appreciation of the complexity of the research problem and the data needed.
6. Structure, presentation and communic-ation

Is engaging and logically-structured with good ‘sign-posting’ which maintains the attention of the intended audience. Very good writing style. Grammar and spelling and referencing are accurate.
Is logically-structured with good ‘sign-posting’ which makes the proposal clear to the intended audience. Good writing style. Grammar and spelling and referencing are accurate.
Is fairly well structured with adequate ‘sign-posting’. Good writing style. Grammar and spelling and referencing are mainly accurate.
Shows some attempt to structure the proposal in a logical manner. Meaning apparent, but language not always fluent.  Grammar and/or spelling and/or referencing contain errors.
Disorganised/
incoherent.
Meaning unclear and/or grammar and/or spelling and/or referencing contain frequent errors.

To avail of this work opportunity, join Work from Home Academia sites now. Academia sites pays $4-$20 per page for writing reports, research, essays, etc. There are several other companies that allow you to earn for doing Academia related work: Make Money by Doing Home Work.

Archives

.

WorkFromHomePhilippines | Jobs, Make Money, Work in the Philippines

.