Work from Home in the Philippines

Today I’m officially starting my new gameplan for making money online. My first target is to earn 26,000 in passive income–26,000 is our monthly expenses for my family. I am aiming to achieve this in 3 months. Right now, the bulk of my income is from my work-from-home job, so I’d really like to shift it to residual income.

This new gameplan includes:

Having daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly goals and sticking to those goals. In a study of Harvard students, 10% of the students had goals in their minds and they were the ones who earn at least thrice as much as everyone else. Yet 3% of these students have CLEAR WRITTEN GOALS, and it is these same 3% that earn at least ten times as much as everyone else. Keeping a list of your goals is a very powerful time management tool. You’ll be surprised to find how much you can do in a day, plus it really feels good to see all that you have accomplished for the day. It makes you feel good about yourself and keeps you motivated.

Waking up 2 hours early. I intend to wake up two hours earlier just to have time for exercise as well as to work on my most important goals. Big goals means you will be encountering big challenges, and big challenges=STRESS. You’ll really need your health up at its peak to be able to face these challenges.

Learn, learn, learn. Although I’ve stopped college, I never stopped learning. I intend to continue doing so through audio learning and seminars. I’m particularly focusing on success training, leadership, organizational behavior, and business training audios. You can find these on the internet, by the way, like on YouTube. Try a search for Robert Kiyosaki and watch his videos. Buy his book on your local bookstore or borrow one from a businessman.

Have time to relax. This year has been very busy for me. Sometimes I work 7 days a week for two months straight. If I wasn’t keeping myself in top shape through regular 30 minute to an hour exercise then I would probably be sick in bed right now. And no, I’m not a workaholic. I do love to work, but I enjoy my relaxation time as well. I do continue working hard because I’m aiming to retire at 30. Go someplace close to nature, do martial arts training or something, and write the fantasy novel I wanted so much to write.

Tithe more. Everytime I receive money from my job, I go out to buy groceries then hand them out to people sleeping on the streets. When I feel down and really stressed and there are really times when I’m broke because of the bills to pay with my business and due to the past few months of recession, I go out to do the same thing and I feel like ready to work again for the next week.

By next year, I’m aiming to be able to help support a foundation I’ve been working with for differently abled persons. These people are trained in IT, and yet they couldn’t apply their skills yet due to lack of experience and because they have a very slow internet connection right now that takes 20 seconds to load a page and only one PC is connected to the internet. I was thinking of at least sponsoring their internet connection so they could apply their skills and could avail of work through the internet.

Order instructions:
THE PAPER must summarize course text and consider implications for educational administration and REFLECT on individual experience, and CONCLUDE with recommendations for improving eduational administration decision making practices. Begin by listing the number of the question(2), the topic, and the question. You may address question terms by definition or illustration or citation and then discuss implications of the question for work in educational administration. Then, reflect on the significance of the issues for being a college professor on a tenure track and finally conclude with your reccommendations for how the concepts involved in the question might lead to improvement in administration practices in education. You must site the books as two of the three sources. The textbooks are Hellreigel, Don, Slocum John W., Jr., & Woodman, Richard W. (2009). Organizational
Behavior, (12th ed.). Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing, a part of Cengage Learning (Text is accompanied by a CD and study guide as part of a package purchase.) ISBN 0-324-58734-0

Manning, George, & Curtis, Kent (2007 or 2008). The Art of Leadership, (2nd ed.) New York, New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin. (Text has a rich set of exercises and assessments for use by individuals and small groups.)
ISBN 978-0-07-299568-8 or 0-07-07-299568-8

The assignment is question number two and it is:
Contrasting Administrative Perspectives on Motivation.
Question: How do the following three content models of motivation compare AND contrast in explaining the following limited information circumstances ( asking for a raise) and what two implications each of the three models has for alternative administration behaviors in educational administration? ( REMEMBER this class is for those becoming superintendent or college deans and presidents so keep answer to that audience and content should focus around college level or at minimum superintendent leadership.)
a. Maslow’s needs hierarchy model
b. McClelland’s achievement motiviation model
c. Herzberg’s motivation hygiene model?
How are the models similar and different in how they would explain the circumstances below?
In chapter 5 content models on motivation are discussed. Factors related to motivation are a part of the following brief on a situation in the workplace:
ASKING FOR A RAISE: The Equity Argument
Top and middle educational leaders rarely relishthe prospect of asking superiors of boards of directors for a raise. Even more rare is the leader who is good at asking for a raise. Most administrators either dread the potential conflict, or they are uncomfortable with self-promotion, or do not wnat to be seen as ” money grubbers.”
So, how can administrators justify the raise they request(in terms of the three above motivational models)? The answer lies in an application of equity throery of motivation. Arguments used today are realted to market value for a postition, repalcement difficulty, job staisfaction, money to buy time for cultivating significant professional friends, quality of specific expertise,the tight job market,or combinations of these. In short, the argument essentially becomes that fairness dictates that the raise is needed to equalize the administrator’s ratio of outcome to inputs with relevant other’s ratios of outcomet to inputs. Equity might also be emphasized if an administrator offers to renegotiate salary lower if delivered promises are not achieved.